Apple Asks Supreme Court to Review Epic Games App Store Ruling

Apple faces a civil contempt finding after charging a 27% commission on external App Store payments, directly defying a court order to allow such links.

MH
Marcus Havel

May 22, 2026 · 2 min read

The U.S. Supreme Court building with an iPhone displaying the Apple App Store logo and a Fortnite character, symbolizing the legal battle between Apple and Epic Games.

Apple faces a civil contempt finding after charging a 27% commission on external App Store payments, directly defying a court order to allow such links. The tech giant has appealed this ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court, a move that will significantly impact app developers' financial models and the future of digital storefront competition.

The Contempt Charge and Apple's Defiance

A 2021 court ruling, stemming from its legal battle with Epic Games, required Apple to allow developers to direct users to alternative payment options outside its in-app purchase system, according to 9to5Mac. This aimed to foster digital transaction competition.

However, Apple began allowing these external payments but imposed a 27% commission on such purchases, according to TechCrunch. The Ninth Circuit swiftly ruled this 27% fee defeated the injunction's original purpose. A lower court then held Apple in civil contempt over these fees, according to Reuters. Apple's move to charge nearly the same rate for external payments as for its own in-app purchases reveals a clear strategy to circumvent judicial orders while maintaining its revenue stream.

Supreme Court Appeal and Market Impact

Apple has now asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review this Ninth Circuit civil contempt order, according to Reuters. The company challenges rulings concerning the App Store injunction, seeking to maintain its App Store dominance and 27% commission structure, according to 9to5Mac. Apple's appeal demonstrates its firm stance against any erosion of its control over the App Store economy, potentially setting a precedent for how tech giants comply with antitrust rulings.

If Apple's appeal succeeds, developers may face continued high commissions on external payments, limiting revenue and stifling innovation. A ruling against Apple, however, could foster more competitive payment processing options, fundamentally reshaping the financial models for app developers and the broader digital storefront landscape.

The Supreme Court's decision will likely determine whether Apple can continue to extract substantial fees from external transactions, or if developers will finally gain meaningful control over their revenue streams.